Showing posts with label lust. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lust. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 29, 2020

91: Happiness - Nectar -> Poison

 


CHAPTER 18, TEXT 38: That happiness which is derived from contact of the senses with their objects and which appears like nectar at first but poison at the end is said to be of the nature of passion.

Saturday, December 12, 2020

79: Levels of Happiness

CHAPTER 18, TEXT 38: That happiness which is derived from contact of the senses with their objects and which appears like nectar at first but poison at the end is said to be of the nature of passion

Krishna is describing the different kinds of  happiness within the modes of nature. I created the below chart as a map to understanding the patterns of how things begin and how things end. 


Goodness (sattva)

Passion (rajas)

Ignorance (tamas)

Beginning

poison

nectar

poison

End

nectar

poison

poison


An example of happiness in the mode of goodness (sattva) is a college education. Working for a college degree means paying a lot of money for years and years without any income - this often means living in a simple place with simple food, going to class at sometimes early times of the day or late at night after work, hours upon hours of homework, grueling projects and exams, [often] unpaid internships, and more. 

This is like poison. 

But in the end, the nectar of knowledge, a degree, and improved job prospects is what makes college worth it for most people. People with college degrees have been shown to earn more income not only for themselves but for society at large (aplu.org), they have a greater chance of staying married (pewresearch.com), and they are even less likely to be obese and to just have greater health overall (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). This is the "nectar" of happiness in the mode of goodness.

Happiness in the mode of passion is nectar at first and poison in the end. The classic example that Prabhupad gives is - you guessed it - falling in "love." He writes, "A young man and a young woman meet, and the senses drive the young man to see her, to touch her and to have sexual intercourse." This is considered to be "nectar," a source of pleasure, excitement, and all-consuming absorption. Some dating apps exist solely to facilitate this kind of happiness in the mode of passion - meeting and having sex. Prabhupad continues, "In the beginning this may be very pleasing to the senses, but at the end, or after some time, it becomes just like poison. They are separated or there is divorce, there is lamentation, there is sorrow, etc." I once read an article about a woman who had just had sex with a man through using the dating app Tinder and as she was getting dressed he was already swiping through his phone again, looking for the next meet-up. She was appalled, but what could she say? What right did she have to be appalled? The sorrow of this woman and women and men who have used the app or engaged in this pattern is pervasive. 

This is poison. 

While Tinder is a crude example, it is also very relevant to Prabhupad's purport and today's reality.

Something about the fact that happiness in the mode of passion starts off as nectar makes it addictive. We HAD an experience of that pleasure, that high, but we lost it. So if only I would try again, and again, and again... maybe the nectar will last. 

But it never lasts. 

Prabhupad writes, "Happiness derived from a combination of the senses and the sense objects is always a cause of distress and should be avoided by all means." This means that enjoying the objects of my senses with my eyes and ears and hands and tongue is temporary and always fades. 

And quickly. 

How long does the act of sex last? How long can one eat an ice cream cone? How long can one watch Game of Thrones or how many new phones or houses or cars can one buy? The temporary nature of this happiness is what causes distress. The pleasure is there, it's there! And then poof - gone. So this happiness is nectar in the beginning and poison in the end. 

And finally, happiness in the mode of ignorance is poison in the beginning and poison in the end. 

One may wonder how on earth one could experience happiness by tasting poison in the beginning. Wouldn't you just stop even trying for that kind of happiness if it's so poisonous, even from the first taste?

This is the mode of ignorance, though. As I have come to think of ignorance, it is not just "not knowing" something. Ignorance means ignoring something. This implies an active turning away from knowledge, understanding, and growth. 

So in this context, one ignores the poison - the pain, the discomfort, the burn - of that first sip of alcohol, first puff of cigarette, or first taste of meat as a child (https://family-medicine.ca/). With enough ignoring, one even begins to enjoy that poison. The word used in verse 39 is the word sukham, or happiness. 

An example of this kind of happiness is alcohol. I have only ever tasted one drop of alcohol. When I was about thirteen years old, I went to a party with middle school friends and there was beer. I tried a drop and then kind of spit it back out. I never tried it again.  

Alcohol is always some kind of fermented grain or fruit or vegetable, which means that it's rotting. This process of decomposing is in the mode of ignorance - the mode of goodness means maintenance and the mode of passion means creation, but destruction is the mode of ignorance. This is why, traditionally, fermented foods are prohibited in Vaishnava tradition, or they are not recommended or offerable to Krishna.  

Of course, alcohol has been enjoyed around the world for millennia. Still, according to this definition of happiness in the mode of ignorance, alcohol fits the bill. It is poison in the beginning, and while one may still experience happiness from this poison (loosening up inhibitions, relaxing etc), it is still poison in the end - throwing up, headaches, and lack of consciousness or awareness of one's words or actions. In more severe cases if alcohol or any drug use becomes an addiction, one's body can begin to sour, or one's character can even rot through abusive language or behavior. Addiction can lead one to feeling trapped into using the substance to function or numb the pain or maybe to even feel alive. 

Krishna describes happiness in these three modes of nature, but ultimately, we are meant to transcend happiness in any of these modes, we're meant to come to a kind of happiness to "which [we] sometimes come to the end of all distress" (18.36). We're meant to experience happiness that is nectar in the beginning and nectar in the end. This kind of happiness can only be experienced by transcending the modes of nature and this world and coming to God, to Krishna. We're meant to end our distress by loving and serving God. 

Of course, if we're not there yet, we can at least look at these verses to get a sense of "Okay, what mode of happiness am I primarily in right now? How can I elevate my approach to happiness?" 

If I'm in the mode of ignorance, how can I elevate to the mode of passion?   

If I'm in the mode of passion, how can I elevate to the mode of goodness?

If I'm in the mode of goodness, how do I elevate to suddha-sattva (pure goodness) by serving and loving Krishna? 

Monday, November 30, 2020

71: The Function of the Soul

CHAPTER 16, TEXT 21: There are three gates leading to this hell – lust, anger and greed. Every sane man should give these up, for they lead to the degradation of the soul.

One evening many years ago, I was traveling on a bus. The driver of the bus, an elderly, spiritual man, was having a conversation with another traveler, and I eavesdropped on their conversation. 

The man asked, "What is the function of the soul?"

The traveler was silent. My ears perked up and I leaned in to hear the man answer his own question:

"To desire. The function of the soul is to desire," 

Those simple words rang with an eternal truth, and they have echoed in my mind in the many years since. Interesting, no? I can still remember the deep blue evening light, the headlights from oncoming vehicles, the silhouettes of spiky trees as they rushed by. Those words anchor me to that time and space: The function of the soul is to desire

I have seen this eternal truth play out in my life and in the world.

When the soul is in touch with material energy, that eternal propensity to desire transforms into lust. Trying to satisfy the soul's eternal, spiritual desires with temporary, material things is a recipe for frustration, drama, and pain. I speak from experience, here, and I'm sure anyone reading this post would say the same. 

In this verse of the Gita, Krishna is saying that there are three gates leading to hell - lust, anger, and greed. Prabhupad emphasizes, though, that lust is the origin: "One tries to satisfy his lust, and when he cannot, anger and greed arise." Note that Prabhupad writes that one "tries" to satisfy lust, but he "cannot" - it is simply impossible to satisfy lust, like trying to put out a raging fire by feeding it logs soaked with gasoline. It is eventual that one will get to the point of anger and an even more inflamed greed. In verse 12 of this chapter, Krishna describes that an ungodly person is "bound by a network of hundreds of thousands of desires" which is not an exaggeration. Hundreds of thousands of desires may even be an understatement. Those desires lead to the degradation of the soul, as Krishna says in this verse. 

Why? Where does lust come from, this raging fire of desire?

The soul. 

The function of the soul is to desire. 

To quench this fire of desire IS impossible, because to do so would snuff out our very existence. 

The key, then, is to understand that this nature to desire something and someone, always, is divine. Originally, the soul desires to love and be loved, and ultimately to love God and be loved by God. 

The whole process of bhakti yoga is about taking those tendencies of the soul offering them to Krishna. In this way the soul is not degraded, but uplifted.  

Desire Krishna. Desire to serve, desire to connect, desire to love. 

Full purport here: https://vedabase.io/en/library/bg/16/21/



Thursday, November 26, 2020

67: Grateful for the Sting

CHAPTER 15, TEXT 20: This is the most confidential part of the Vedic scriptures, O sinless one, and it is disclosed now by Me. Whoever understands this will become wise, and his endeavors will know perfection.

For about three years of my life, my suitcase was partially or fully (very fully) packed. For three years, I lived in almost a dozen different rooms, apartments, and houses in all parts of the world.

When I began to settle down and at last moved in with my husband after we got married, I became obsessed with staying in one place. I abhorred even the idea of getting on a plane. I gave my suitcases to Goodwill with a "good riddance!" 

I then became obsessed with setting up our home. I would sometimes cackle to myself, "This is my kitchen, my bedroom, my apartment, my clothes, it's mine, all mine!" Over the past five years I have spent thousands of dollars on buying furniture, decor, plants, clothing, shoes, kitchen tools, and more plants. I must confess, I'm still consumed, because we have moved once again and are setting up our home again. 

I have become aware of a needle that jabs at my heart the more I feed this desire to buy and buy and buy. That jabbing weakens me. Over the years I have felt the sting and the resulting weakness build. 

How come this shopaholicism relates at all to this verse of the Gita where Krishna is describing a wise man who will know perfection? 

Prabhupad writes how the word "anagha" is significant in this verse because it means that Krishna is addressing Arjuna as "O sinless one." This means that to know Krishna we must be free of all material contamination and bad karma. The loophole, though, is that "devotional service is so pure and potent that once one is engaged in devotional service he automatically comes to the stage of sinlessness." This is good news for all of us, because Krishna has described devotional service as so easy that one can simply offer a leaf, flower, fruit or water with love and Krishna will accept (9.26). By such a simple, painless process, we can all become sinless. 

So if devotional service is that easy, how come we're not all doing it? How come we're not all wise and how come we're all so very far away from perfection? 

Weakness of heart, Prabhupad says. 

He writes, "The most important thing one has to surmount is weakness of the heart."

This weakness of heart determines more of our destiny than any bad karma. After all, bad karma can be lessened or even erased by devotional service. But when our very character is weak, then this is the greatest, most important thing to overcome. After all, all bad karma stems from a weakness of heart - that is what created all the negative reactions in the first place. 

So what is weakness of heart? 

"The first falldown is caused by the desire to lord it over material nature."

This is where we come back to my obsession with things. I had been so detached from my belongings and home and clothes for so long that I swung in the other direction and became obsessed with, shall we say, lording it over material nature. I became the lord of my apartment, and triumph flooded me - this place is all mine, muahaha! 

That triumph still floods me. I relish in buying more and more things, and I'm never satiated. Always looking for the next conquest to purchase. 

But the needle in my heart is beginning to sting and even make me go numb. When I get so absorbed in lording over material nature, "one gives up the transcendental loving service of the Supreme Lord." I'm so attached to material things that I feel a numbness to even performing a simple act here or there of love - you know, offer a leaf. 

A leaf, man, that's it. 

But no, I'd rather go buy a dress. Or a chair. Or a mirror. For us. Well, for me. 

From this first weakness of heart, the desire to lord it over material nature, comes the second weakness of heart, which "is that as one increases the propensity to lord it over material nature, he becomes attached to matter and the possession of matter." In this way, I become more attached and more absorbed in the possession of matter than the expression of service to the Lord. I want to enjoy myself, not have God enjoy. I am in the center, not God. 

Prabhupad concludes, "The problems of material existence are due to these weaknesses of the heart."

As long as I cultivate this weakness of my heart to lord it over material nature, so will the numbness continue to grow until I can no longer even fold my palms in prayer. 

Once again I am writing this post, unsure how to conclude because I honestly do not have a straight solution for you. It seems far too simplistic to simply say, "I shall stop lording over material nature," snap my fingers and *poof* all gone! There go my desires! Now I can engage in devotional service again! 

As I write, I realize that the only thing I can do is be aware that I even have a weakness of heart. There are plenty of people on this planet who are plagued with shopaholicsm on either or tiny or gargantuan scale who have no idea that it's a weakness of heart. They're just going along, looking for the next high by buying the next thing, not even aware that they're numbing their hearts more and more and more, the weakness draining their vitality. 

So at the very least, I am aware. I feel the sting. And in that sense, I am grateful for the sting. Maybe that's the first step of wisdom.

Full purport here: https://vedabase.io/en/library/bg/15/20/

Monday, November 23, 2020

64: A Dark Future

CHAPTER  14, TEXT 16: The result of pious action is pure and is said to be in the mode of goodness. But action done in the mode of passion results in misery, and action performed in the mode of ignorance results in foolishness.

In this purport, Prabhupad lays out clear logic that "indulgence in animal killing for the taste of the tongue is the grossest kind of ignorance." This is not Prabhupad being judgmental or disgusted. He is simply building upon this verse, 14.16, especially "action performed in the mode of ignorance results in foolishness." 

How is killing animals for the sake of the tongue foolish? How come it's it in the mode of ignorance? 

The foundation of this logic begins with the word ignorance, which is translated as "lack of knowledge or information" (Oxford Languages). 

Simple. 

If one performs an action without appropriate knowledge or information, the action and the results are often harmful to the self and to others. 

For example, I am ignorant of surgical procedures. I have a lack of knowledge and information (A BIG LACK) in order to produce a result that won't harm my patient (stab an artery...??) or harm myself (all those malpractice lawsuits!). In this regard, "the performer is without knowledge, and therefore all his activities result in present misery." This means that a lack of knowledge (ignorance) when we perform an action results in misery, not just a hazy confusion or discomfort. 

Misery. 

And misery for everyone

Lack of awareness and the repeated choosing to ignore and turn away from knowledge and reality leads the soul to "go on toward animal life. Animal life is always miserable, although, under the spell of the illusory energy, māyā, the animals do not understand this." Animals are all in varying states of ignorance, surviving from day to day, operating from a place of instinct and driven to eat, mate, and defend. This is a miserable existence, but souls in these bodies are not even aware just how miserable they are. In a sense, animals are innocent. Animals do not produce karma, or reaction to their actions, because they are simply acting out of instinct. 

But human beings can choose to act from a place beyond instinct, humans can act from a place of knowledge. Prabhupad writes, "Slaughtering poor animals is also due to the mode of ignorance. The animal killers do not know that in the future the animal will have a body suitable to kill them. That is the law of nature." Only human beings who kill animals or participate in the process of killing and eating animals recur this reaction to one day be slaughtered in kind. As Prabhupad says here, "That is the law of nature." If karma is working in all other spheres of existence as a divine system of justice, then this system also applies for killing animals. Thus, if one kills an animal to enjoy the tongue, "one has to pay for it." Action and reaction is a law of nature. 

Thus we come to where we began this post: "indulgence in animal killing for the taste of the tongue is the grossest kind of ignorance." Animal killing is the grossest kind of ignorance because there is such a fundamental lack of knowledge and information that if I kill another living being I am responsible for its death. 

What's more, "A human being has no need to kill animals, because God has supplied so many nice things." Nowadays, some would reject this statement and assert that some people just can't not eat meat because of his or her blood type or constitution. My sister professes that if she does not eat meat she becomes very unhealthy. I confess, I'm not a nutritionist or health science expert. That said, I am going off of Prabhupad's purport here, and he is emphasizing that [all] human beings do not need to eat meat, as "God has supplied so many nice things." 

Okay, so if one is aware of the law of karma and aware that killing animals to enjoy meat is not the best for a bunch of reasons, how come this post or any debate or discussion is unlikely to change anyone's stance on eating meat?  

I once debated this topic of vegetarianism in a Bioethics class in my undergraduate degree. We discussed all the reasons, from environmental impacts, to health reasons, and for this class especially, the ethical obligations of slaughtering animals for meat. 

The conclusion was pretty obvious: don't eat meat. 

But no one in the class, including my professor, was moved to make a change in behavior. 

One day, I approached my professor after class to assert that really there is only one reason that people eat meat and will not give it up: the taste. People enjoy the taste, texture, and experience of meat. 

The professor, a highly educated, sharp man in his thirties, at last conceded. He said, "I find it to be one of the greatest failings in my life that I'm not a vegetarian. But... I just love the taste of meat,"

One may have the knowledge and philosophical reasons to not eat meat, but at the end of the day, the fact that meat tastes good trumps all. In this sense, if one has the knowledge and information to not eat meat - that's not ignorance any more, right? In this case, then, ignorance is a true "ignore-ing" of what meat is (flesh of animals) and what the consequences are (being killed in kind). So "If one indulges in meat-eating anyway, it is to be understood that he is acting in ignorance and is making his future very dark." 

Full purport here: https://vedabase.io/en/library/bg/14/16/

Sunday, November 22, 2020

63: Divine Fire

CHAPTER 14, TEXT 12: O chief of the Bhāratas, when there is an increase in the mode of passion the symptoms of great attachment, fruitive activity, intense endeavor, and uncontrollable desire and hankering develop.

In the three modes of material nature that Krishna is describing in this 14th chapter, the primary mode that I identify with is the mode of passion. 

Krishna describes in the seventh verse, "The mode of passion is born of unlimited desires and longings." 

Yesss. 

Unlimited desires.

Like a fire. The fire is blazing and hot and demands fuel. I feel the burn and so with great effort and sacrifice I find the fuel to place into the fire - but the fire only increases. The fire burns brighter and hotter, demanding even more fuel than before. 

This is my life. 

My desires are unlimited. From clothing to contact lenses. From shoes to dining chairs to trips to India. To earrings to pairs of glasses to a Mercedes-Benz SUV to analmondmilkmaker to a gymmembership

toawafflemakertorunningshoestomoreearrings

on and on and on and on and on

and on. 

Not only do I yearn for tangible things, I yearn for intangible things, like a good job, good friends, recognition, degrees and accolades, invitations, and more. Prabhupad writes, "One in the mode of passion is never satisfied with the position he has already acquired; he hankers to increase his position." Always more. A fire doesn't burn peacefully at one steady level. The fire is consuming the fuel, and if the fire is not fed more, the flames begin to die out. 

For some reason, I am deathly afraid of those flames going out - it's almost as if I let those flames go out, my very life would go out. I would have no spice to life, no reason to live. So my desires burn in my heart, and I feed them; I am always hankering to increase my position and my things and my importance. 

Why? Why do I burn with so many desires?

Well, to enjoy. I want to enjoy my senses, both subtle and gross. For my gross senses I want to taste good food and drink, I want to see beautiful things and cool movies, I want to relax in a comfortable chair. For the subtle ways to enjoy, I want the prestige of having beautiful things and others admiring what  I own, I want the honor of having a prestigious job and being seen as accomplished and powerful. For the person in the mode of passion (like me), "he develops a great hankering for sense gratification. There is no end to sense gratification."

No. End. As Krishna says in this verse, "uncontrollable desires" develop in the mode of passion. 

I'd like to say that I'm on a spiritual path and want to learn how to love and clean my heart and all that. 

At the same time, the fact of the matter is that if you really pulled back the cover of my heart and peeked inside, that is what you would see: a blazing fire of desires consuming my mind at all times. 

Right now, I do not have any easy solution to these all-consuming desires, so simple trick to reduce the fire. The only way is to stop feeding them, and the prospect of not feeding them seems almost impossible right now. As I mentioned, feeding desires substitutes for a sense of purpose - it's easier to shop and acquire things than to live a purposeful life of navigating tricky relationships. To be honest, I choose shopping over calling a friend or spiritual activities. 

So yeah, I don't have a solution. 

But as I write this, some small voice is reminding me: there is a spiritual greed. 

That greed is called laulyam

You don't have to extinguish the fire of desire in your heart.

Just start feeding your fire some spiritual goals, some uplifting desires. 

Being consumed with greed to know and love Krishna, or krishna laulyam, is a divine fire, a fire that I actually want to burn in my heart. 

Full purport here: https://vedabase.io/en/library/bg/14/12/

Friday, April 3, 2020

28: Healthy Soul

CHAPTER 6, TEXT 16: There is no possibility of one’s becoming a yogī, O Arjuna, if one eats too much or eats too little, sleeps too much or does not sleep enough.

How fascinating that an ancient scripture that is meant for realization of the divine - a seemingly ethereal and otherworldly endeavor - is giving advice straight out of the family doctor's list of guidelines.

Don't eat too much.

Don't eat too little.

Don't sleep too much.

Don't sleep too little.

Moderation, moderation, moderation.

So practical. So simple. Deep down, we all know that these guidelines are essential for a healthy body, even a healthy mind.

But a healthy soul?

Krishna says that "there is  no possibility of one's becoming a yogi" if one does not learn these practical steps of moderation.

Eating and sleeping are primary functions of what it means to even be alive, no matter what species. But human beings have elevated eating and sleeping to be some of the most pleasurable experiences of existence.

No other animal cooks its food. Other animals eat their food raw (no oven! no stovetop!) and as is (no salt! no spices!). Human beings love to eat, and often, we eat too much. Prabhupad writes, "Too much eating means eating more than is required to keep the body and soul together." Other than the family doctor advising a patient to eat in moderation to keep body and soul together for health reasons, why is overeating considered unfavorable for becoming a yogi?

Because eating beyond one's need is really about enjoying for oneself. Satisfying myself. I'M the center.

But becoming a yogi is about putting God in the center.

Learning to love is about putting others in the center.

Now, to enjoy food and enjoy life is a need - the soul is naturally pleasure-seeking, ananda mayo bhyasat (Vedanta Sutra). Deprivation will only backfire - I'm sure we've all had the equivalent experience of going on a diet or juice cleanse or whatever and then bingeing on potato chips when it's over. This pendulum swing of indulgence-deprivation actually just keeps the focus on US, we're still in the center. Whether I'm enjoying or suffering, the focus is still on me, and that defeats the goal of yoga and the goal of love.

Indeed, even when one eats to keep body and soul together, still we can keep Krishna in the center of this activity by offering all the food we eat to Him first.

Here Krishna, You enjoy first. You're the center.

Once You're satisfied, THEN I'll enjoy.

Learning to eat just enough and learning to let God enjoy first is the key to keeping a healthy soul.

Full purport for Chapter 6, Text 16 by Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupad here: https://vedabase.io/en/library/bg/6/16/

Friday, March 20, 2020

18: From Lust to Love and Back Again

CHAPTER 3, TEXT 37: The Supreme Personality of Godhead said: It is lust only, Arjuna, which is born of contact with the material mode of passion and later transformed into wrath, and which is the all-devouring sinful enemy of this world.

For me, the word "enemy" brings to mind Hitler, Osama bin Laden, and murderers in prison. Pushed a little further, an "enemy" is war, slavery, global warming, plastic straws, sweatshops, and cocaine. These all-devouring "enemies" tear at our souls and have us question the very definition of what it means to be a human being - Hitler destroyed millions and cocaine continues to destroy millions. How could this happen? How could we let this happen?

Why?

Krishna is telling us here that the enemy is not outside, the enemy is inside.

The sinful enemy of this world is lust.

Lust only.

What a striking declaration. Now, lust is described as all-devouring, sinful, and an enemy. That definitely brings to mind characteristics that I would assign to Hitler, war, and cocaine. But what is so profound about this verse that underneath lust is the most profound nature of the soul: love.

Srila Prabhupad elaborates: "When a living entity comes in contact with the material creation, his eternal love for Kṛṣṇa [God] is transformed into lust, in association with the mode of passion" (162). This means that the line between lust and love is much thinner than we could ever imagine.

Prabhupad continues: "Or, in other words, the sense of love of God becomes transformed into lust, as milk in contact with sour tamarind is transformed into yogurt." Both milk and yogurt come from the cow, and are composed of the same substance. But when the sour tamarind of the mode of passion comes in contact with the milk of love, the milk transforms into a completely distinct substance with a different taste, texture, and chemical properties. Yogurt is milk, and yet it is not. Lust is love, and yet is not.

Lust has such power to destroy and devour the soul because it is the reflection of the deepest prerogative of the soul: to love.

What's more, the intrinsic propensity of the soul is to serve. But once again, when the soul comes in contact with the mode of passion, "the service attitude is transformed into the propensity for sense enjoyment" (163). Service means that I am caring for another, concerning myself with the needs and wants of another, and in its highest expression I serve God and others in complete selflessness. But in this material world, that propensity turns inward: I want to serve myself. I want to serve my own senses and desires and goals. I become the center. Ultimately, love transforms into lust, and the path of lust is destructive and filled with endless pain.

The only hope is that maybe, one day, the soul becomes "completely baffled by prolonged lustful activities, [and] the living entities begin to inquire about their real position." Indeed, too much war, too much global warming, too much cocaine, too many plastic straws, and we can hopefully become baffled. Hopefully, we get sick of the pain and the suffering and yearn for meaning. Athatho brahma-jijnasa - one should inquire into the absolute truth (163). Hopefully, we inquire about our real position, which is to serve and to love. 

There is hope. Much like how beneath the disgusting mask of a monster lies a beautiful maiden, so beneath the mask of lust lies love. In this sense, we can actually feel compassion for ourselves, whenever lust begins to consume our hearts, for we can simply notice that our propensity to love is simply being misplaced. The process of Krishna consciousness is about learning how to offer our love in the right place. Ultimately, "lust and wrath, when they are employed in Krsna consciousness, become our friends instead of our enemies."

If lust is the greatest enemy of the world, then if lust is employed in Krishna consciousness to awaken the love dormant within the heart of each and every living being, then that lust and love have the greatest potential to transform the world. 

P.S. The purport of this verse given by Srila Prabhupad is brilliant; you're encouraged to check it out here: https://vedabase.io/en/library/bg/